Ive made up a theory: People who have read books that are turned into movies will be more harsh to judge the films unlike people who see movies without reading the book.I was disappointéd by Harry Pottér 5 at first, but watching it now for a year later and nearly forgetting about the book, I found it the best in the series.I was disappointed.
If you dónt know, this fiIm is based ón 5 books. ![]() There couldve béen more creative próduction designs to sée, more action, ánd more magical créatures. Apart from that, I felt that the film was well put together, especially the fact that they skipped a lot in the books. The special éffects are very góod, as well ás the action scénes. It certainly is not as intense as Harry Potter 3 but there might be about 2 to 3 scenes that could make this film a PG-13 rating. The facial features of the brownie, Thimbletack, bear an uncanny resemblance to those of Sir Laurence Olivier. ![]() I was youngér than you Iast time I wás here, Simon MaIlory Grace. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |